|
Tier-1
|
Tier-2
|
Tier-3
|
|
Understand the function of the part and assessing the loads acting on the parts and fixations.
|
convert create a FEM model and carry out static analysis using ANSYS |
carry out dynamic analysis and endurance life prediction using ANSYS
|
Kits and aids
Colleges not having ANSYS can approach SAEINDIA for short term licenses.
Competition rules
Actual
analysis done off line
10 Min
Presentation at the competition
Any structural (Static, dynamic) problem can be taken by students from automotive domain
The assembly should have minimum 3 parts and maximum 7 parts
Software should be ANSYS (For pre-processing, solution and post processing)
Teams
Team size: 2
students
Number of
teams for Tier-1: as many as possible
One team
from each college moves to Tier-2 (division level)
Two teams
from each division moves to Tier-3 (convention)
Judging criteria
|
Tier-1 |
Tier-2 |
Tier-3 |
|
Quality of function analysis
Free
body diagram
Estimating
loads
Defining fixations
|
Quality of function analysis
Free
body diagram
Estimating
loads
Defining fixations
Choice of load conditions
Choice of boundary conditions
Element
selection
Mesh
sizing
Material
allocation
Interpretation of static analysis results
|
Quality of function analysis
Free body diagram
Estimating loads
Defining fixations
Choice of load conditions
Choice of boundary conditions
Element
selection
Mesh
sizing
Material
allocation
Interpretation of static analysis results
Interpretation of dynamic analysis results
Interpretation of endurance analysis results
Suggestions for improvements
|
The concept
The
students pick up an automotive part and design the manufacturing
process using computer aided manufacturing where applicable
Alignment with curriculum
Materials
and manufacturing processes
Production
technology
CAM
Expectations
|
Tier-1
|
Tier-2
|
Tier-3
|
|
identify material and appropriate manufacturing process
|
define various steps in manufacturing and identify scope for CAM
|
application of CAM for the
identified step |
Kits and aids
Colleges not having Pro-E can approach SAEINDIA for short term licenses
Competition rules
Actual Work
to be done off line
10 Min
Presentation at the competition
Models must be done using PRO-E software
Teams
Team size: 2
students
Number of
teams for Tier-1: as many as possible
One team
from each college moves to Tier-2 (division level)
Two teams
from each division moves to Tier-3 (convention)
Judging criteria
|
Tier-1 |
Tier-2 |
Tier-3 |
|
Quality
of function analysis
Material properties required
Finish
and precision required
Correctness
of material
Correctness
of manufacturing process for the material, finish and
precision
|
Quality
of function analysis
Material
properties required
Finish
and precision required
Correctness
of material
Correctness
of manufacturing
process
for the material, finish and precision
Process
flow for the chosen process
Appropriateness
of CAM application
CAM
program |
Quality
of function analysis
Material
properties required
Finish
and precision required
Correctness
of material
Correctness
of manufacturing process for the material, finish and
precision
Process
flow for the chosen process
Appropriateness
of CAM application
CAM
program
Tool
path optimization
Simulation
|
The concept
A large private sector enterprise
would like to explore new growth avenues in major world markets
with a specific focus on India, with a view of pursuing
ambitious growth trajectories, addressing larger market-place
opportunities and contributing significantly to larger
socio-economic needs. The business plan should seek to leverage
natural and/or human resources and capabilities unique to India.
The plan may cover an established industry or a service area
through a green field project and/or an acquisition. The plan
should chart a roadmap to a dominant market position and
subsequent expansion for international operations.
Contestants are required to
envisage scalable business plans within the framework of the
following industry sector. In order to provide the contestants
an idea of some of the opportunities existing in this sector,
certain cues have been provided. These cues are meant to direct
the attention of the contestants to certain sub-sectors and/or
markets and are not binding on the actual business plan itself.
Alignment with curriculum
Product
design
Manufacturing
processes
Industrial
economics
Entrepreneurship
development
Expectations
|
Tier-1
|
Tier-2
|
Tier-3
|
|
Clear idea, some business case and broad action plans
|
Clear strategy, effectiveness check and use of referenced data
|
Detail in all aspects with necessary action plan
|
Kits and aids
Business
Plan Examples
Competition rules
Actual modeling done off line
Demonstration and interview at the competition
Teams
Team size: 5
students
Role
description for each member of the team
Any number
of teams for Tier-1
Business plan reporting
Two
parts
written
plan (<4000 words) + executive summary (<300 words)
presentation
Data
taken should be referenced
2
printed copies + electronic file in pdf format
Last date for submitting reports
Tier-2: 31
Sep 2010 for Tier-2
Tier-3: 11th
Sep 2010 for Tier -3
One team
from each college moves to Tier-2 (division level)
Two team
from each division moves to Tier-3 (convention)
Judging criteria
|
I. Written Business Plan (40%) |
|
Please
evaluate the written business plan on the following
aspects : |
|
(Using this rating system :
1 = very poor, 2 = poor, 3 = fair, 4 = adequate, 5 =
good, 6 = very good, 7 = excellent) |
|
1 |
Executive Summary (5%) |
|
(Clear, exciting and effective as a stand - alone
overview of the plan) |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
|
Comments
/ Questions _________________________________________________ |
|
______________________________________________________________________ |
|
2 |
Company Overview (5%) |
|
(Business purpose, history, genesis of concept, current
status, overall strategy and objectives Comments /
Questions) |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
|
Comments
/ Questions ________________________________________________ |
|
______________________________________________________________________ |
|
3 |
Products or Services (10%) |
|
(Description, features and benefits, pricing, current
stage of development, proprietary position) |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
|
Comments
/ Questions _________________________________________________ |
|
______________________________________________________________________ |
|
4 |
Market and Marketing Strategy (10%) |
|
(Description of market, competitive analysis, needs
identification, market acceptance, unique capabilities,
sales / promotion) |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
|
Comments
/ Questions _________________________________________________ |
|
______________________________________________________________________ |
|
5 |
Operations (15%) |
|
(Plan for production / delivery of product or services,
product cost, margins, operating complexity, resources
required) |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
|
Comments
/ Questions _________________________________________________ |
|
______________________________________________________________________ |
|
6 |
Management (10%) |
|
(Backgrounds of key individuals, ability to execute
strategy, personnel needs, organizational structure,
role of any non - student executive, which students will
execute plan) |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
|
Comments
/ Questions _________________________________________________ |
|
______________________________________________________________________ |
| |
In rating each of the above, please consider the
following questions:
Is this area covered in adequate detail?
Does the plan show a clear understanding of the
elements that should be addressed?
Are the assumptions realistic and reasonable?
Are the risks identified and the ability to manage
those risks conveyed? (Using this rating system: 1 = very poor, 2 = poor, 3 =
fair, 4 = adequate, 5 = good, 6 = very good, 7 =
excellent) |
|
7 |
Summary Financials (10%) |
|
Presented in summary form and are easy to read and
understand. |
|
Consistent with plan and effective in capturing
financial performance; Monthly for year 1, Quarterly for
years 2-3, annually for years 4-5. |
|
a |
Cash Flow Statement |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
|
b |
Income
Statement |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
|
c |
Balance
Sheet |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
|
d |
Funds
Required / Uses |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
|
e |
Assumptions / Trends/ Comparatives |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
|
Comments
/ Questions _________________________________________________ |
|
______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ |
|
8 |
Offering (10%) |
|
(Proposal / terms to investors--indicates how much
needed, the ROI, the structure of the deal, and possible
exit strategies) |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
|
Comments
/ Questions __________________________________________________ |
|
______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ |
|
9 |
Viability (20%) |
|
(Market opportunity, distinctive competence, management
understanding, investment potential) |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
|
Comments
/ Questions _________________________________________________ |
|
______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ |
|
10 |
Brevity and Clarity (5%) |
|
(Is the plan approximately 25 pages with
minimal redundancy) |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
|
Comments
/ Questions _________________________________________________ |
|
______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ |
|
II. Presentation (20%) |
|
(Using this rating system :
1 = very poor, 2 = poor, 3 = fair, 4 = adequate, 5 =
good, 6 = very good, 7 = excellent) |
|
1 |
Formal
Presentation (50%) |
|
a |
Materials presented in clear, logical and/or sequential
form |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
|
b |
Ability to relate need for the company with meaningful
examples, and practical applications. |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
|
c |
Ability to maintain judges interest. |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
|
d |
Quality of Visual Aids. |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
|
2 |
Questions
and Answers (50%) |
|
a |
Ability to understand judges inquiries. |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
|
b |
Appropriately respond to judges inquiries with
substantive answers. |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
|
c |
Use of time allocated (minimal redundancy). |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
|
d |
Poise and confidence (think effectively on their feet). |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
|
Strengths of Presentation
|
|
Weaknesses of Presentation
|
|
III. Viability of Company (40%) |
|
|
| |
Definitely No |
Definitely Yes |
|
|
1 |
Market Opportunity (20%)
(There is a clear market need presented as well as a way
to take advantage of that need.) |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
|
2 |
Distinctive Competence
(20%)
(The company provides something novel / unique / special
that gives it a competitive advantage in its market.) |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
|
3 |
Management Capability
(20%)
(This team can effectively develop this company and
handle the risks associated with the venture.) |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
|
4 |
Financial Understanding
(20%)
(This team has a solid understanding of the financial
requirements of the business.) |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
|
5 |
Investment Potential
(20%)
(The business represents a real investment
opportunity in which you would consider investing.) |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
The concept
The student
selects a topic, collects information and presents his findings.
Alignment with curriculum
Subject from
the curriculum
Self
learning
Paper
format SAE International Format
Expectations
|
Tier-1
|
Tier-2
|
Tier-3
|
|
Basic data collection
Logical reporting |
Good depth
of data collection
Correlation of data collected from different sources
Some hint of an original idea or conclusion
|
Quantitative
validation of original idea either through
theoretical investigation or experimental
investigation |
Topics
Alternate
Propulsion Technologies
Advanced Engine Technologies
Fuel
Injection Systems
Hybrid
and Electric vehicles
Emerging
Fuels and Fuel Cells
Energy
Storage Systems and Infrastructure
Safety
and Crash
NVH and
Cabin Comfort
Vehicle
Dynamics and Handling
Fuel
Economy and CO2
After-Treatment
and Emissions
3R
Reduce, Reuse and Recycle
Automotive
Electronics
Communication
Networks
Automotive
Infotronics
Nano
Technology
Advanced
Light Weight materials
Aero
structures and technologies
Off
Highway Vehicles
Dynamic
Modeling Processes
Automotive
Testing and Instrumentation
Vehicle
Architecture
Product
Development Tools and Techniques
Policies,
Regulations and Standards
Public,
Private and Academic Partnerships
Kits and aids
None
Competition rules
Paper should
be submitted one week ahead of competition date.
Presentation
in the competition
7 minutes
presentation
3 minutes
question and answer
Teams
Team size: 2
students
Number of
teams for Tier-1: as many as possible
One team
from each college moves to Tier-2 (division level)
Two teams
from each division moves to Tier-3 (convention)
Judging criteria
|
Tier-1 |
Tier-2 |
Tier-3 |
|
Alternate Propulsion Technologies
70% for quality of paper
Criteria: according to SAE International
30% for presentation
Criteria: quality of slides, clarity of
presentation, confidence in answering queries
Data
collection |
The concept
Testing the general automotive
knowledge of students by asking questions related to technical
and other related automotive subjects
History
Places
Personalities
Technologies
Companies
Vehicle
types and specifications
Statistics
of vehicles and so on
Alignment with curriculum
All
automotive related subjects
Expectations
|
Tier-1
|
Tier-2
|
Tier-3
|
|
Generic
answers with aids using clue and so on
Less
questions |
Generic
answers without aids
Medium
no of questions |
Specific
answers without aids
More
questions |
Kits and aids
Not
applicable
Competition rules
Five
rounds
General
pass allowed
Audio
visual pass allowed
Specialization
round no pass
(topic will be same as for the
Technical paper presentation)
Rapid
fire no pass
Jackpot
no pass
Time
per team for answers
For
rounds other than rapid fire
30
seconds on direct
15
seconds on pass
For rapid fire round
120
seconds for 10 questions
Marks
First
time right 5 marks
Bonus
1 mark
Rapid
fire 2 marks for right answer
Negative
mark -1 for wrong answer as per the following rules
Tier-1
No negative marks
Tier-2
Negative marks for rounds where pass is allowed
Tier-3
Negative marks for all rounds
Teams
Team size: 3 students
Number of teams for Tier-1 = number of members / 10
One team from each college moves to Tier-2 (division level)
Two teams from each division moves to Tier-3 (convention)
Difficulty and number questions
As per the
expectations at different Tiers mentioned above
|
Graphical
System Design
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
LabVIEW Basics 1 |
LabVIEW Basics 2 |
State Space For Monitor
Control |
State Space For Control
Systems |
Control Design manual |
The concept
Graphical
system Design, Prototyping and Deployment
Alignment with curriculum
Virtual
Instrumentation
Embedded
control system design
Rapid
prototyping concepts
This is control design toolkit tutorials and links:
http://zone.ni.com/devzone/cda/tut/p/id/6477
http://zone.ni.com/devzone/cda/tut/p/id/7020
http://zone.ni.com/devzone/cda/tut/p/id/5553
http://zone.ni.com/reference/en-XX/help/370853D-01/lvctrldsgn/state_space_controller/
Expectations
|
Tier-1
|
Tier-2
|
Tier-3
|
|
Choose
an existing automotive system component from list and develop the
linear mathematical model of the plant.
Add
non-linearity to the plant model to accommodate for real world
operating conditions
List:
Power train, suspension, steering, engine, transmission, gear, fuel
cell, hybrid power, fuel injection.
|
Choose
an existing automotive system component from list and simulate the
linear mathematical model of the plant in LabVIEW.
Connect
the controller to the plant model and analyze closed loop
characteristics of the model.
List:
Power train, suspension, steering, engine, transmission, gear, fuel
cell, hybrid power, fuel injection |
Use
the interactive LabVIEW Control Design Assistant and Mathscript
window to develop linear model of the plant model.
Complete
the control design process by running the plant model on the PC and
demonstrate controllability and observability of the plant and
controller by deploying the control process on Compact RIO.
Analyze
the open loop characteristics of the plant using time or frequency
response functions. Synthesize the model of a controller for
controlling the linear model of the plant. Simulate the controller
and analyze the open loop characteristics.
|
Topic
Engine and
subsystems
Engine and Combustion
Engine Management Systems
Emission Management
Transmission
(gear box, clutch, rear axle etc)
Manual Transmission
Automatic Transmissio
Hybrid Transmission
Suspension
system and components
Hydro-pneumatic suspension
Semi-active suspension
Active suspension
Braking
system and components
Brake-by-wire
Anti-lock Braking system
Adaptive Cruise control
Steering
system and components
Hydraulic steering
Electric Power Steering
Steer-by-wire
Seating and
door systems
Seating
Body Control
Safety and Driver assist 454
Kits and aids
LabVIEW
Student Edition, Training manuals for LabVIEW, Single board RIO.
Competition rules
Actual
modeling done off line
Demonstration
and deployment at the competition
Teams
Team size: 3
students,
Number of
teams for Tier-1 = number of members / 10
One team
from each college moves to Tier-3 (division level)
Judging criteria
|
Tier-1 |
Tier-2 |
Tier-3 |
|
Choice
of the sub-system for modeling - 30%
Completeness
of plant mathematical model - 30%
Accuracy
of plant model -40%
|
Graphical
plant model generation using System Identification-
20%
Open
loop characteristics of plant from system ID model -
20%
Graphical
controller model generation using System
Identification- 20%
Simulation
of controller and choice of control structure and
control co-efficients- 40% |
Simulation
results of linear plant model- 10%
Simulation
results of non-linear plant model- 20%
Tuning
of controller for non-linear operating conditions- 20%
Closed
loop analysis - 20%
Deployment
of controller and demonstrating
controllability and observability parameters- 30% |
BACK